In recent years a debate has developed over whether Aristotle's theory of the psuchê is properly characterized as having been "functionalist" in the sense that contemporary computational cognitive scientists claim to be adherents of that position. It is argued here that there are indeed some similarities between Aristotle's theory and that of contemporary functionalists, but that the differences between them make it misleading, at best, for functionalists to look to Aristotle for ancient support. In particular, it is argued that Aristotle would not have -- indeed, specifically did not -- support the claim, central to functionalism, that the mind can, in principle, be transported from one body to another simply by instantiating in the new body some set of organizational properties that were instantiated in the old.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Aristotle and Modern Mathematical Theories of the Continuum.Anne Newstead - 2001 - In Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou & James Brown (eds.), Aristotle and Contemporary Philosophy of Science. Peter Lang.
Against the Functionalist Reading of Aristotle's Philosophy of Perception and Emotion.Eric LaRock - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):231-258.
Gadamer's Praise of Theory: Aristotle's Friend and the Reciprocity Between Theory and Practice.Walter A. Brogan - 2002 - Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):141-155.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #188,288 of 2,143,561 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #386,858 of 2,143,561 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.