Understanding bayesian procedures

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):201-202 (1998)
Chow's account of Bayesian inference logic and procedures is replete with fundamental misconceptions, derived from secondary sources and not adequately informed by modern work. The status of subjective probabilities in Bayesian analyses is misrepresented and the cogent reasons for the rejection by many statisticians of the curious inferential hybrid used in psychological research are not presented
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X98301168
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,780
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Bayesian Model Learning Based on Predictive Entropy.Jukka Corander & Pekka Marttinen - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):5-20.
Optimum Inductive Methods.R. Festa - 1993 - Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
Bayes in the Brain--On Bayesian Modelling in Neuroscience.M. Colombo & P. Series - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):697-723.
When Can Non‐Commutative Statistical Inference Be Bayesian?Miklós Rédei - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):129-132.
Bayesian Analyses of Hume's Argument Concerning Miracles.Michael Levine - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):101-106.
Bayesian Probability.Patrick Maher - 2010 - Synthese 172 (1):119 - 127.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
5 ( #656,804 of 2,214,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,824 of 2,214,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature