Will the real Enlightenment historian please stand up? Catharine Macaulay versus David Hume

In Stephen Buckle Craig Taylor (ed.), Hume and the Enlightenment. Pickering & Chatto (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argues that on an interpretation of the Enlightenment which emphasises its radical potential and importance for the development of democracy Catharine Macaulay should be recognised as a more centrally Enlightenment historian than David Hume.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,621

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Catharine Macaulay.Karen Green - 2012 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Letters on education.Catharine Macaulay - 1790 - New York: Woodstock Books.
David Hume: "the historian".David Wootton - 1993 - In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press. pp. 281--312.
David Hume's theory of mind.Daniel E. Flage - 1990 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-20

Downloads
1 (#1,756,842)

6 months
1 (#1,011,292)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Green
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Catharine Macaulay.Karen Green - 2012 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references