Evo-devo meets the mind: Toward a developmental evolutionary psychology

In Roger Sansom & Robert Brandon (eds.), Integrating Evolution and Development: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 195-225 (2007)

Authors
Paul Edmund Griffiths
University of Sydney
Abstract
The emerging discipline of evolutionary developmental biology has opened up many new lines of investigation into morphological evolution. Here I explore how two of the core theoretical concepts in ‘evo-devo’ – modularity and homology – apply to evolutionary psychology. I distinguish three sorts of module – developmental, functional and mental modules and argue that mental modules need only be ‘virtual’ functional modules. Evolutionary psychologists have argued that separate mental modules are solutions to separate evolutionary problems. I argue that the structure of developmental modules in an organism helps determine what counts as a separate evolutionary problem for that organism. I suggest that homology as an organizing principle for research in evolutionary psychology, has been severely neglected in favor of analogy (adaptive function). I consider some arguments suggesting that determining homology is less epistemically demanding than determining adaptive function and argue that psychological categories defined by homology are, in fact, more suitable objects of psychological – and particularly neuropsychological – investigation than categories defined by analogy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,386
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Sciences of the Artificial.Herbert A. Simon - 1969 - [Cambridge, M.I.T. Press.
The Modularity of Mind.Jerry Fodor - 1983 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):613-617.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Convergence as Evidence.Adrian Currie - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):763-786.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
104 ( #78,475 of 2,271,756 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #326,749 of 2,271,756 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature