Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):648-653 (2005)
Receiving information about threats to one’s health can contribute to anxiety and depression. In contemporary medical ethics there is considerable consensus that patient autonomy, or the patient’s right to know, in most cases outweighs these negative effects of information. Worry about the detrimental effects of information has, however, been voiced in relation to public health more generally. In particular, information about uncertain threats to public health, from—for example, chemicals—are said to entail social costs that have not been given due consideration. This criticism implies a consequentialist argument for withholding such information from the public in their own best interest. In evaluating the argument for this kind of epistemic paternalism, the consequences of making information available must be compared to the consequences of withholding it. Consequences that should be considered include epistemic effects, psychological effects, effects on private decisions, and effects on political decisions. After giving due consideration to the possible uses of uncertain information and rebutting the claims that uncertainties imply small risks and that they are especially prone to entail misunderstandings and anxiety, it is concluded that there is a strong case against withholding of information about uncertain threats to public health.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Gentle Ethical Defence of Homeopathy.David Levy, Ben Gadd, Ian Kerridge & Paul A. Komesaroff - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):203-209.
Food Law, Ethics, and Food Safety Regulation: Roles, Justifications, and Expected Limits. [REVIEW]Daniel Sperling - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):267-278.
Moral and Instrumental Norms in Food Risk Communication.Peter G. Modin & Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (2):313 - 324.
Similar books and articles
ÂOn a Supposed Right to Lie [to the Public] From Benevolent Motivesâ Communicating Health Risks to the Public.Darren Shickle - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):241-249.
Determinants of Health: Theory, Understanding, Portrayal, Policy.Matt Commers - 2002 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Privacy, Public Health, and Controlling Medical Information.Adam D. Moore - 2010 - HEC Forum 22 (3):225-240.
Public Health Paternalism: Continuing the Dialogue.Thomas Nys - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (3):294-298.
Why It's Time to Stop Worrying About Paternalism in Health Policy.J. Wilson - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):269-279.
Health Information: Reconciling Personal Privacy with the Public Good of Human Health. [REVIEW]Lawrence O. Gostin - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (3):321-335.
Public Health Paternalism—a Response to Nys.Stephen Holland - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (3):285-293.
Mental Ill Health, Public Health and Medicalization.A. Vilhelmsson, T. Svensson & A. Meeuwisse - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):207-217.
Added to index2010-01-17
Total downloads124 ( #38,379 of 2,158,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #15,735 of 2,158,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?