This paper argues that Ellis’ analysis of Fundamentalism as narcissistically disturbed can apply to the very scientific disciplines he relies upon to make his argument. Citing Elizabeth Lloyd’s critique of methodological objectivity, I draw a parallel between the overstated belief that humans can defy finitude through certainty gained via scientific objectivity and Ellis’ charge that the religious faithful deny human limits in their delusional certainty in an afterlife. I link scientism and religious fundamentalism in their apodictic assertions and their instrumentalism. I argue that Ellis’ insight into the narcissistic nature of fundanlentalism is, by being successful, a challenge to his project in so far as it rests on a scientific fundamentalism. Finally, I offer resolution by appealing to Gandhi’s notion of satyagraha or conflict resolution through mutual recognition of the core veridical insights embedded in opposing viewpoints.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1077-1999
DOI pcw200815222
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,481
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytical Perspectives on Religious Fundamentalism.Jakobus Martinus Vorster - 2007 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 6 (17):5-20.
Philosophy, Religion and Love: Ellis on the Fundamental Need for Inspiration.David Chan - 2008 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (2):82-90.
Sandu Frunzã, Religious Fundamentalism and the New Conflict of Ideologies.Ioana Roxana Havrici - 2003 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 2 (6):200-202.
Gandhi’s Nonviolent Resistance: A Justified Use of Force?Lloyd Steffen - 2008 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1):69-81.
Die grundlagen Des modernen fundamentalismus.Karol Giedrojc - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (2):427-442.
Perspectives on the Core Characteristics of Religious Fundamentalism Today.Jakobus M. Vorster - 2008 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 7 (21):44-65.
What Makes a Fundamentalist? Metaphysics, Morality and Psychology.Volker Kaul - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (4-5):509-514.


Added to PP index

Total views
19 ( #558,689 of 2,446,297 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,806 of 2,446,297 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes