Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):11-32 (2009)
Dobzhansky argued that biology only makes sense if life on earth has a shared history. But his dictum is often reinterpreted to mean that biology only makes sense in the light of adaptation. Some philosophers of science have argued in this spirit that all work in ‘proximal’ biosciences such as anatomy, physiology and molecular biology must be framed, at least implicitly, by the selection histories of the organisms under study. Others have denied this and have proposed non-evolutionary ways in which biologists can frame these investigations. This paper argues that an evolutionary perspective is indeed necessary, but that it must be a forward-looking perspective informed by a general understanding of the evolutionary process, not a backward-looking perspective informed by the specific evolutionary history of the species being studied. Interestingly, it turns out that there are aspects of proximal biology that even a creationist cannot study except in the light of a theory of their effect on future evolution
|Keywords||Philosophy Evolutionary Biology Philosophy of Biology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Assigning Biological Functions: Making Sense of Causal Chains.Benoni B. Edin - 2008 - Synthese 161 (2):203-218.
Ontology and Teleofunctions: A Defense and Revision of the Systematic Account of Teleological Explanation.Craig S. Delancey - 2006 - Synthese 150 (1):69-98.
The Functional Perspective of Organismal Biology.Arno Wouters - 2005 - In Thomas Reydon & Lia Hemerik (eds.), Current Themes in Theoretical Biology. Springer. pp. 33--69.
Citations of this work BETA
The Phylogeny Fallacy and the Ontogeny Fallacy.Adam Hochman - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (4):593-612.
A Mixed Self: The Role of Symbiosis in Development.Thomas Pradeu - 2011 - Biological Theory 6 (1):80-88.
The Boundaries of Development.Thomas Pradeu, Lucie Laplane, Michel Morange, Antonine Nicoglou & Michel Vervoort - 2011 - Biological Theory 6 (1):1 - 3.
Research Traditions and Evolutionary Explanations in Medicine.Pierre-Olivier Méthot - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (1):75-90.
Organism and Artifact: Proper Functions in Paley Organisms.Sune Holm - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):706-713.
Similar books and articles
Evolution as a Cognition Process: Towards an Evolutionary Epistemology. [REVIEW]Franz M. Wuketits - 1986 - Biology and Philosophy 1 (2):191-206.
How to Understand Casual Relations in Natural Selection: Reply to Rosenberg and Bouchard. [REVIEW]Mohan Matthen & Andre Ariew - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):355-364.
The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology.Timothy Shanahan - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Does Nothing in Evolution Make Sense Except in the Light of Population Genetics?Lindell Bromham - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (3):387-403.
Methodological Problems in Evolutionary Biology I. Testability and Tautologies.Wim J. Steen - 1983 - Acta Biotheoretica 32 (3).
Preadaptation and the Explanation of Human Evolution.Cameron Shelley - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (1):65-82.
The Discovery of Evolution.David Young - 2007 - Cambridge University Press, in Association with Natural History Museum, London.
Evolution, Naturalism, and the Worthwhile: A Critique of Richard Joyce's Evolutionary Debunking of Morality.Christopher Toner - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (4):520-546.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads70 ( #72,963 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?