Liberalism, altruism and group consent

Public Health Ethics 2 (2):146-157 (2009)
This article first describes a dilemma for liberalism: On the one hand restricting their own options is an important means for groups of people to shape their lives. On the other hand, group members are typically divided over whether or not to accept option-restricting solutions or policies. Should we restrict the options of all members of a group even though some consent and some do not? This dilemma is particularly relevant to public health policy, which typically target groups of people with no possibility for individuals to opt out. The article then goes on to propose and discuss a series of aggregation rules for individual into group consent. Consideration of a number of scenarios shows that such rules cannot be formulated only in terms of fractions of consenters and non-consenters, but must incorporate their motives and how much they stand to win or lose. This raises further questions, including what is the appropriate impact of altruistic consenters and non-consenters, what should be the impact of costs and benefits and whether these should be understood as gross or net. All these issues are dealt with in a liberal, anti-paternalistic spirit, in order to explore whether group consent can contribute to the justification of option-restricting public health policy.
Keywords Collective self-regulation  Paternalism  Aggregation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/phe/php014
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Kalle Grill, Liberalism, altruism and group consent
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
J. Trout (2005). Paternalism and Cognitive Bias. Law and Philosophy 24 (4):393-434.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Johannes Kniess (2015). Obesity, Paternalism and Fairness. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (11):889-892.
Jessica Flanigan (2013). Public Bioethics. Public Health Ethics 6 (2):170-184.
Pak-Hang Wong (2016). Consenting to Geoengineering. Philosophy and Technology 29 (2):173-188.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

197 ( #18,900 of 1,903,046 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

15 ( #54,453 of 1,903,046 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.