- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time: Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philosophy
David Ray Griffin (ed.)
State University of New York Press (1986)
Abstract
But there is considerable consensus, even among writers who disagree radically about the ultimate significance of time so understood, that time as ...Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
David R. Griffin, ed., Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time: Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philosophy. [REVIEW]Niall Shanks - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6:469-471.
Reply to Comments of John Cobb and David Griffin.David Bohm - 1986 - In David Ray Griffin, Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time: Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philosophy. State University of New York Press. pp. 172--6.
Bohm and Process Philosophy: A Response to Griffin and Cobb'in Griffin, DR.Lg Barbour - 1986 - In David Ray Griffin, Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time: Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philosophy. State University of New York Press. pp. 167--171.
Introduction: Time and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness.David Ray Griffin - 1986 - In Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time: Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philosophy. State University of New York Press.
Time, the implicate order and pre-space.David Bohm - 1986 - In David Ray Griffin, Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time: Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philosophy. State University of New York Press. pp. 172--208.
The Unreality and Indeterminacy of the Future in the Light of Contemporary Physics.Milič Čapek - 1986 - In David Ray Griffin, Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time: Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philosophy. State University of New York Press. pp. 297-308.
Time and Higher-Order Wholeness: A Response to David Bohm.Steven M. Rosen - 1986 - In David Ray Griffin, Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time: Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philosophy. State University of New York Press. pp. 219--230.
Między nauką a filozofią [recenzja] The New Physics, red.: P. Davies, 1989. Physical Cosmology and Philosophy, red.: J. Leslie, 1990. Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time. Bohm, Progogine and Process Philosophy, red.: David R. Griffin, 1986. The. [REVIEW]Tomasz Komendziński - 1991 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 13.
Whitehead’s Radically Temporalist Metaphysics: Recovering the Seriousness of Time.Jesse Berger - 2020 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 41 (2):203-206.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-06-22
Downloads
41 (#599,861)
6 months
1 (#1,594,795)
2010-06-22
Downloads
41 (#599,861)
6 months
1 (#1,594,795)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Natural Philosophy and the Sciences: Challenging Science’s Tunnel Vision.Arran Gare - 2018 - Philosophies 3 (4):33.
A Whiteheadian approach to Bell's correlations.Shimon Malin - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (10):1035-1044.
Quantum Paradoxes, Time, and Derivation of Thermodynamic Law: Opportunities from Change of Energy Paradigm.Helmut Tributsch - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):287-306.
The place of chinese logics in comparative logics: Chinese logics revisited.Walter Benesch - 1991 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18 (3):309-331.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-qtxsx uwo