Public reason’s private roles: legitimising disengagement from religious patients and managing physician trauma

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (11):714-715 (2019)

Abstract
Greenblum and Hubbard argue that physicians are duty-bound by the constraints of Rawlsian ‘public reason’ to avoid engaging their patients’ religious considerations in medical decision-making.1 This position offers a number of appealing benefits to physicians. It will appear plausible because Rawls’s philosophical tradition of Political Liberalism enjoys the status of ideological orthodoxy in institutions tasked with forming the moral imaginations of physicians and other elites.2 3 It casts the physician in the role of a ‘reasonable person’ occupying the space of public reason whose medical and ethical judgments are opposed by ‘sectarian’ religious patients who refuse to be reasonable. This narrative authorises the exclusion of patient religious considerations from medical decision making when they do not ‘translate’ into reasons recognised by ‘reasonable’ medical professionals and manages the trauma of overwhelmed physicians by legitimising disengagement from difficult interactions with religious patients. The authors’ arguments depend on concepts from Rawls’s Political Liberalism 4 and are presented as if the premises of Liberal theory are incontestable—despite the fact that a large body of philosophical literature challenging its premises and core concepts has existed for decades.3 5–7 This ‘nothing to see here, move along’ approach saves more space for anecdotes about religious people, at which …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105779
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.Stephen Mulhall - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (177):542-545.
Negotiating the Moral Order: Paradoxes of Ethics Consultation.Bette-Jane Crigger - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (2):89-112.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Public and Private.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (5):2-2.
The Neglected Repercussions of a Physician Advertising Ban.Sandra Zwier - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (3):198-201.
Public Reason.David Gauthier - 1995 - Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (1):19-42.
Is Informed Consent Effective in Trauma Patients?A. Bhangu, E. Hood, A. Datta & S. Mangaleshkar - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):780-782.
Public Reason/Private Religion? A Response to Paul J. Weithman.David Hollenbach - 1994 - Journal of Religious Ethics 22 (1):39 - 46.
Against Public Reason Liberalism's Accessibility Requirement.Kevin Vallier - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):366-389.
Public Use of Reason, Communication and Religious Change.Romulus Brancoveanu - 2011 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 10 (28):154-175.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-04

Total views
2 ( #1,297,321 of 2,286,096 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #571,423 of 2,286,096 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature