Relative Identity

Clarendon Press (1977)
Abstract
The author attacks the view that identity, Like largeness, Is a relative relation. The primary advocate of the view that identity is relative is p.T. Geach. It is argued that geach has not shown that the failure of the identity of indiscernibles principle, As a truth of logic, Forces us to stop taking indiscernibility within particular formal theories or languages as a sufficient condition for identity. The author also argues that the whole notion of relative identity, As explicated by geach, Is very probably incoherent.
Keywords Identity (Philosophical concept
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $14.65 used (64% off)   $77.11 new    Amazon page
Call number BC199.I4.G74
ISBN(s) 0198244096  
DOI 10.2307/2214425
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,359
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally Demonstrated?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):317-370.
Should Bayesians Sometimes Neglect Base Rates?Isaac Levi - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):342.
Performing Competently.Lola L. Lopes - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):343-344.

View all 41 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
46 ( #126,533 of 2,225,162 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #249,976 of 2,225,162 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature