Response to “Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Don't Use the Wrong Cases” by Howard Brody and “Commentary: Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Are the Cases Wrong?” by L.J. Schneiderman [Book Review]

In a recent issue of CambridgeQuarterlyofHealthcareEthics, Howard Brody and Lawrence Schneiderman offer contrasting opinions about how to apply the concept of in medicine. Brody holds that are those in which it is reasonably certain that a given intervention when applied for the purpose of attaining a specific clinical goal. To determine which actions are futile, Brody prescribes a division of labor. Patients are charged with choosing the goals of treatment while physicians are charged with determining whether specific treatments will be effective in achieving these goals. Though physicians do not choose specific goals, Brody thinks they have a prerogative to decide whether they can, in good conscience, aid in the achievement of specific patient goals. Let us use to denote choosing between alternative goals and to denote choices about whether one will assist in the pursuit of particular goals. Brody's position is essentially that patients are positive validators and that physicians are negative validators. Brody concludes that treatments that are effective in achieving patients' goals are not futileFutilitypromote a goal that both agree is desirable.”
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0963180199004156
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,370
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Don't Use the Wrong Cases.Howard Brody - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):269-273.
A Broader Look at Medical Futility.Wayne Shelton - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):383-400.
Towards a Just, Courageous, and Honest Resolution of the Futility Debate.Rosemarie Tong - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):165-189.
Defining Medical Futility and Improving Medical Care.Lawrence Schneiderman - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):123-131.
Judging Who Should Live: Schneiderman and Jecker on the Duty Not to Treat.William Harper - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):500 – 515.
Futility and the Varieties of Medical Judgment.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2).
Necessary Evil: Justification, Excuse or Pardon? [REVIEW]Vinit Haksar - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):333-347.
Medical Futility and Physician Discretion.M. Wreen - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (3):257-267.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
22 ( #233,713 of 2,193,765 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #42,651 of 2,193,765 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature