Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):446-447 (2008)
The for addiction proposed by Redish and colleagues is only unified at a reductionist level of analysis, the biological one relating to decision-making. Theories of addiction may be complementary rather than mutually exclusive, suggesting that limitations of individual theories might be unified through the combination of ideas from different biopsychosocial systems perspectives
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Abstract Concepts Require Concrete Models: Why Cognitive Scientists Have Not Yet Embraced Nonlinearly Coupled, Dynamical, Self-Organized Critical, Synergistic, Scale-Free, Exquisitely Context-Sensitive, Interaction-Dominant, Multifractal, Interdependent Brain-Body-Niche Systems.Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Han L. J. van der Maas & Simon Farrell - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):87-93.
Comments on Complexity and Experimentation in Biology.Richard M. Burian - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):291.
A Grounded Approach to the Study of Complex Systems.Kara Vander Linden - 2006 - World Futures 62 (7):491 – 497.
Symbionomic Evolution: From Complexity and Systems Theory, to Chaos Theory and Coevolution.Joël De Rosnay - 2011 - World Futures 67 (4-5):304 - 315.
A Unified Framework for Addiction: Vulnerabilities in the Decision Process.A. David Redish, Steve Jensen & Adam Johnson - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):415-437.
Chronic Mental Illness and the Limits of the Biopsychosocial Model.Dirk Richter - 1999 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (1):21-30.
The Biopsychosocial Approach: Past, Present, and Future.Richard M. Frankel, Timothy E. Quill & Susan H. McDaniel (eds.) - 2003 - University of Rochester Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #493,510 of 2,172,660 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,660 )
How can I increase my downloads?