Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Pseudo-Scientific by Karl Popper's Criterion of Demarcation?
American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):131 - 141 (1979)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Popper, laws, and the exclusion of biology from genuine science.David N. Stamos - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (4):357-375.
Refutability revamped: How quantum mechanics saves the phenomena.Frederik A. Muller - 2003 - Erkenntnis 58 (2):189 - 211.
Between autobiography and reality: Popper's inductive years.M. Hark - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):75-100.
Karl R. Popper and the problem of historical prediction.Edward B. Solomon - 1960 - Dissertation, Mcgill University
Methodology, Epistemology and Conventions: Popper's Bad Start.John Preston - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:314 - 322.
The seven sins of pseudo-science.A. A. Derksen - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):17 - 42.
Progress as a demarcation criterion for the sciences.Paul M. Quay - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (2):154-170.
Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?: Demarcation revisited.Robert Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
From the conscious into the unconscious: What can cognitive theories of psychopathology learn from Freudian theory?Karin Mogg, Lusia Stopa & Brendan P. Bradley - 2001 - Psychological Inquiry 12 (3):139-143.
Is Psychoanalysis a Pseudo-Science? Karl Popper versus Sigmund Freud.Adolf Grünbaum - 1977 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 31 (3):333 - 353.
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.Karl Raimund Popper - 1962 - London, England: Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-05-29
Downloads
308 (#38,823)
6 months
10 (#88,581)
2011-05-29
Downloads
308 (#38,823)
6 months
10 (#88,581)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life.Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1.
Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem.Maarten Boudry - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (2):83-101.
Immunizing Strategies and Epistemic Defense Mechanisms.Maarten Boudry & Johan Braeckman - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (1):145-161.
The seven sins of pseudo-science.A. A. Derksen - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):17 - 42.
