Popper's Fundamental Misdiagnosis of the Scientific Defects of Freudian Psychoanalysis

In Zuzana Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. Springer. pp. 117--134 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Epistemic Predicament of a Pseudoscience: Social Constructivism Confronts Freudian Psychoanalysis.Maarten Boudry & Filip Buekens - 2011 - Theoria 77 (2):159-179.
Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Pseudo-Scientific by Karl Popper's Criterion of Demarcation?Adolf Grünbaum - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):131 - 141.
Las críticas de Popper al psicoanálisis.Fernanda Clavel de Kruyff - 2004 - Signos Filosóficos 6 (11s):85-99.
A critique of Popper's views on scientific method.Nicholas Maxwell - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (2):131-152.
Existential psychoanalysis and Freudian psychoanalysis.Louis N. Sandowsky - 2005 - Janus Head (Special Edition on Philosophical Practice) 8 (2).
The heart of man's destiny: Lacanian psychoanalysis and early Reformation thought.Herman Westerink - 2012 - New York: Routledge.
The "tally argument" and the validation of psychoanalysis.Robert C. Richardson - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):668-676.
Freudian theory and consciousness: A conceptual analysis.A. Sousa - 2011 - Mens Sana Monographs 9 (1):210.
A Fearsome Trap: The will to know, the obligation to confess, and the Freudian subject of desire.John Ambrosio - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):728-741.
Shrink yourself: the complete do-it-yourself guide to freudian psychoanalysis.Ted Meyer - 2001 - New York: Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Griffin.
Luce Irigaray: the (un)dutiful daughter of psychoanalysis. A feminist ‘moving through and beyond’ the phallogocentric discourse of psychoanalysis.Evelien Geerts - manuscript
Is Psychoanalysis a Pseudo-Science? Karl Popper versus Sigmund Freud.Adolf Grünbaum - 1977 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 31 (3):333 - 353.
Psychoanalyzing Historicists?: The Enigmatic Popper. [REVIEW]Setargew Kenaw - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):315 - 332.
Impious fidelity: Anna Freud, psychoanalysis, politics.Suzanne Stewart-Steinberg - 2011 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
28 (#542,235)

6 months
7 (#364,455)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adolf Grunbaum
Last affiliation: University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references