Till grüne-yanoff and Sven ove Hansson Royal institute of technology, stockholm firstname.lastname@example.org.Se
We propose to model preference change as the change of an agent’s preference state in response to the agent accepting a preference affect. The preference state of an agent is ruled by various inferential commitments. Accepting a preference affect will likely bring the preference state into inconsistency. The model shows how the preference state needs to be adjusted to restore consistency. In particular, it shows which path restoration will take, conditional on the previous preference state and the available dynamic information, and it determines how the ensuing preference state will look like.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Model of Non-Informational Preference Change.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical Politics 23 (2):145-164.
Coping with the Unpredictable Effects of Future Technologies.Sven Hansson - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):137-149.
A Logical Analysis of the Relationship Between Commitment and Obligation.Churn-Jung Liau - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (2):237-261.
Mismeasuring the Value of Statistical Life.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):109-123.
Proposition-Preferences and World-Preferences.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:147-152.
A New Semantical Approach to the Logic of Preference.Sven Ove Hansson - 1989 - Erkenntnis 31 (1):1 - 42.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-10-13
Total downloads1 ( #890,592 of 2,177,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?