A couple of the nasties lurking in evidence-based medicine

Social Epistemology 22 (4):333 – 352 (2008)
The Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) movement is an ideological force in health research and health policy which asks for allegiance to two types of methodological doctrine. The first is the highly quotable motherhood statement: for example, that we should make conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence (paraphrasing Sackett). The second type of doctrine, vastly more specific and in practice more important, is the detailed methodology of design and analysis of experiments. This type of detailed methodological doctrine tends to be simplified by commentators but followed to the letter by practitioners. A number of interestingly dumb claims have become entrenched in prominent versions of these more specific methodological doctrines. I look at just a couple of example claims, namely: Any randomised controlled trial (RCT) gives us better evidence than any other study. Confidence intervals are always useful summaries of at least part of the evidence an experiment gives us about a hypothesis. To offer a positive doctrine which might move us past the current conflict of micro-theories of evidence, I propose a mild methodological pluralism: in any local context in which none of a variety of scientific methodologies is clearly and uncontentiously right, researchers should not be discouraged from using any methodology for which they can provide a good argument
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0269-1728  
DOI 10.1080/02691720802566961
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,106
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Randomized Controlled Trial: Gold Standard or Merely Standard?J. Grossman & F. Mackenzie - 2005 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (4):516-34.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Better Grounding for Person-Centered Medicine?Miles Little - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (8):40-42.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

27 ( #190,097 of 2,171,799 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,799 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums