Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument

Argumentation 16 (3):277-286 (2002)
This paper responds to two aspects of Ralph Johnson's Manifest Rationality (2000). The first is his critique of deductivism. The second is his failure to make room for some species of argument (e.g., visual and kisceral arguments) proposed by recent commentators. In the first case, Johnson holds that argumentation theorists have adopted a notion of argument which is too narrow. In the second, that they have adopted one which is too broad. I discuss the case Johnson makes for both claims, and possible objections to his analysis
Keywords deductivism  formal deductive logic  kisceral arguments  natural language deductivism  Ralph Johnson  the metaphysics of argument  visual arguments
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1019993002329
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,422
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Donald T. Siebert Jr (1975). Johnson and Hume on Miracles. Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (3):543 - 547.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

9 ( #439,497 of 1,924,770 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #417,923 of 1,924,770 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.