The Linguistic Review 24 (4):423-429 (2007)
In this note, I clarify the point of my paper “The Nature of Semantics: On Jackendoff’s Arguments” (NS) in light of Ray Jackendoff’s comments in his “Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The State of the Art.” Along the way, I amplify my remarks on unification
|Keywords||semantics unification naturalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Syntax of Galileo: Reply to Ray Jackendoff. [REVIEW]James H. Bunn - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (1):137-147.
Vector Symbolic Architectures Are a Viable Alternative for Jackendoff's Challenges.Ross W. Gayler - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):78-79.
Ray Jackendoff's Phenomenology of Language as a Refutation of the 'Appendage' Theory of Consciousness.Ralph D. Ellis - 1996 - Pragmatics and Cognition 4 (1):125-137.
Why a Conceptualist View of Reference? A Reply to Abbott.Ray Jackendoff - 1998 - Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (2):211-219.
Parts and Boundaries.Ray Jackendoff - 1992 - In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & Conceptual Semantics. Blackwell. pp. 9-45.
Information is in the Mind of the Beholder.Ray S. Jackendoff - 1985 - Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (February):23-33.
Jackendoff's Conceptualism.James Higginbotham - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):680-681.
The Nature of Semantics: On Jackendoff's Arguments.Steven Gross - 2005 - Linguistic Review 22:249-270.
Added to index2009-04-22
Total downloads252 ( #13,616 of 2,168,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)57 ( #3,674 of 2,168,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?