The Linguistic Review 24 (4):423-429 (2007)

Steven Gross
Johns Hopkins University
In this note, I clarify the point of my paper “The Nature of Semantics: On Jackendoff’s Arguments” (NS) in light of Ray Jackendoff’s comments in his “Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The State of the Art.” Along the way, I amplify my remarks on unification
Keywords semantics  unification  naturalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Language as a Natural Object.Noam Chomsky - 2000 - In New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 106--133.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Jackendoff's Conceptualism.James Higginbotham - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):680-681.
Information is in the Mind of the Beholder.Ray Jackendoff - 1985 - Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (February):23-33.
Semantics And Cognition.Ray S. Jackendoff - 1983 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Parts and Boundaries.Ray Jackendoff - 1992 - In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & Conceptual Semantics. Blackwell. pp. 9-45.
Why a Conceptualist View of Reference? A Reply to Abbott.Ray Jackendoff - 1998 - Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (2):211-219.


Added to PP index

Total views
453 ( #20,834 of 2,507,021 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #73,865 of 2,507,021 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes