Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):115-121 (2008)
AbstractIn their important paper “Autonomous Agents”, Floridi and Sanders use “levels of abstraction” to argue that computers are or may soon be moral agents. In this paper we use the same levels of abstraction to illuminate differences between human moral agents and computers. In their paper, Floridi and Sanders contributed definitions of autonomy, moral accountability and responsibility, but they have not explored deeply some essential questions that need to be answered by computer scientists who design artificial agents. One such question is, “Can an artificial agent that changes its own programming become so autonomous that the original designer is no longer responsible for the behavior of the artificial agent?” To explore this question, we distinguish between LoA1 (the user view) and LoA2 (the designer view) by exploring the concepts of unmodifiable, modifiable and fully modifiable tables that control artificial agents. We demonstrate that an agent with an unmodifiable table, when viewed at LoA2, distinguishes an artificial agent from a human one. This distinction supports our first counter-claim to Floridi and Sanders, namely, that such an agent is not a moral agent, and the designer bears full responsibility for its behavior. We also demonstrate that even if there is an artificial agent with a fully modifiable table capable of learning* and intentionality* that meets the conditions set by Floridi and Sanders for ascribing moral agency to an artificial agent, the designer retains strong moral responsibility.
Similar books and articles
Artificial Moral Agents: Saviors or Destroyers?: Wendell Wallach and Colin Allen: Review of Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong. Oxford University Press, 2009, Xi + 275 Pp, ISBN 978-0-19-537404-9. [REVIEW]Jeff Buechner - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):363-370.
Computer Ethics in the Post-September 11 World.Herman T. Tavani, Frances S. Grodzinsky & Richard A. Spinello - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):181-182.
Editorial Introduction – Ethics of New Information Technology.Philip Brey, Luciano Floridi & Frances Grodzinsky - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):109–109.
Information Ethics: Agents, Artefacts and New Cultural Perspectives. [REVIEW]Luciano Floridi & Julian Savulescu - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):155-156.
Privacy, Deontic Epistemic Action Logic and Software Agents.V. Wiegel, M. Hoven & G. Lokhorst - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):251-264.
Editorial: Moral Luck, Social Networking Sites, and Trust on the Web. [REVIEW]Maria C. Bottis, Frances S. Grodzinsky & Herman T. Tavani - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):297-298.
Morality and Machines: Perspectives on Computer Ethics. Stacey L. Edgar.Leslie Regan Shade - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):71-73.
Morality and Machines: Perspectives on Computer Ethics. Stacey L. Edgar.Shade Leslie Regan - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):71-73.
Introduction to Computer Ethics: Philosophy Enquiry. [REVIEW]Deborah G. Johnson, James H. Moor & Herman T. Tavani - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (1):1-2.
Bibliometric Mapping of Computer and Information Ethics.Richard Heersmink, Jeroen den Hoven, Nees Eck & Jan den Berg - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):241-249.
Bernard Gert's Morality and its Application to Computer Ethics.Triplett Timm - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1):79-92.
Giannis Stamatellos: Computer Ethics—A Global Perspective: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, 2007, 141 Pp, ISBN: -13: 978-0-7637-4084-9, -10: 0-7637-4084-5. [REVIEW]Mark H. Rosenbaum - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):371-373.
Computer Ethics: Its Birth and its Future.Terrell Ward Bynum - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):109-112.
Ethics, Computing and Medicine. Informatics and the Transformation of Health Care. Kenneth W. Goodman, Editor.Marian Verkerk - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):303-304.
Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, Edited by Batya Friedman.John M. Artz - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):305-306.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Embedding Values in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems.Ibo van de Poel - 2020 - Minds and Machines 30 (3):385-409.
A Normative Approach to Artificial Moral Agency.Dorna Behdadi & Christian Munthe - 2020 - Minds and Machines 30 (2):195-218.
Autonomous Weapons and Distributed Responsibility.Marcus Schulzke - 2013 - Philosophy and Technology 26 (2):203-219.
Human Goals Are Constitutive of Agency in Artificial Intelligence.Elena Popa - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1731-1750.
Artificial Moral Agents Are Infeasible with Foreseeable Technologies.Patrick Chisan Hew - 2014 - Ethics and Information Technology 16 (3):197-206.