The randomized controlled trial: Gold standard or merely standard?

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (4):516-34 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.
Why There’s No Cause to Randomize.John Worrall - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):451-488.
What are randomised controlled trials good for?Nancy Cartwright - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (1):59 - 70.
Are rcts the gold standard?Nancy Cartwright - 2007 - Biosocieties 1 (1):11-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-21

Downloads
82 (#197,729)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references