Woods and Walton of the Fallacies, 1972-82
Abstract
This paper is an in depth discussion of the work on fallacies collected in the "Selected Papers" of Woods and Walton. While it defends many of their claims, it argues that they have not shown that their formal approach should be an integral part of that discipline we now call "informal logic".Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Fallacies, Blunders, and Dialogue Shifts: Walton‘s Contributions to the Fallacy Debate.Christopher W. Tindale - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (3):341-354.
Argument: Critical Thinking, Logic and the Fallacies (M. Hogan).J. Woods, A. Irvine & D. Walton - 2002 - Philosophical Books 43 (1):43-45.
Which of the fallacies are fallacies of relevance?Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):237-250.
Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies John Woods and Douglas Walton Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1982. Pp. xiv, 273. $12.95. [REVIEW]George Englebretsen - 1983 - Dialogue 22 (2):353-356.
Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms.Douglas N. Walton - 1987 - John Benjamins.
Logical Dialogue-games and Fallacies.Douglas N. Walton - 1984 - Lanham, Md. : University Press of America.
A World of Difference: The Rich State of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2).
The Contextuality of Fallacies.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):59-68.
Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry.Louise Cummings - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (2).
Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory.Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (2):102-128.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-04-02
Downloads
10 (#891,033)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2015-04-02
Downloads
10 (#891,033)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads