From Speculative Nanoethics to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology

NanoEthics 4 (2):91-101 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the wake of the emergence and rapid development of nanoethics there swiftly followed fundamental criticism: nanoethics was said to have become much too involved with speculative developments and was concerning itself too little with actually pending questions of nanotechnology design and applications. If this diagnosis is true, then large parts of nanoethics are misguided. Such fundamental criticism must surely either result in a radical reorientation of nanoethics or be refuted for good reasons. In this paper, I will examine the critics’ central arguments and, building on this scrutiny, formulate an answer to these alternatives. The results lead to conclusions which allow explaining and unfolding the thesis of this paper that instead of speculative nanoethics we should better speak of and develop explorative philosophy of nanotechnology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-09

Downloads
84 (#196,609)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Case Against Perfection.Michael J. Sandel - 2004 - The Atlantic (April):1–11.
Das Prinzip Verantwortung.Hans Jonas - 2015 - Freiburg i. Br.: Rombach Verlag. Edited by Dietrich Böhler & Bernadette Herrmann.
Nanotechnology — a new field of ethical inquiry?Armin Grunwald - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):187-201.

View all 16 references / Add more references