Ozone and Climate: Scientific Consensus and Leadership

Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (1):73-101 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article compares the cases of ozone layer protection and climate change. In both cases, scientific expertise has played a comparatively important role in the policy process. The author argues that against conventional assumptions, scientific consensus is not necessary to achieve ambitious political goals. However, the architects of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change operated under such assumptions. The author argues that this is problematic both from a theoretical viewpoint and from empirical evidence. Contrary to conventional assumptions, ambitious political regulations in the ozone case were agreed under scientific uncertainty, whereas the negotiations on climate change were much more modest albeit based on a large scientific consensus. On the basis of a media analysis, the author shows that the creation of a climate of expectation plus pressure from leader countries is crucial for success.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strange Weather, Again.Brian Wynne - 2010 - Theory, Culture and Society 27 (2-3):289-305.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
9 (#1,258,729)

6 months
3 (#984,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Reiner Grundmann
Nottingham University

References found in this work

The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment.M. Grubb, C. Vrolijk & D. Brack - 2001 - Environmental Values 10 (4):556-558.

Add more references