Inquiry 19 (1-4):443 – 454 (1976)
This paper deals with the question of whether and when it is appropriate or inappropriate to say that a social group performs an action. After some remarks on the concept of action three kinds of groups are distinguished, i.e. assemblies, institutions, and classes. It is found that in the first two of these cases predication of action is possible: an assembly can act in that all its members act, or some of them do who are interchangeable with any others; and an institution can act because it has a structure and some individuals can act on its behalf. A class, however, cannot be said to act, for its concept may be freely formed, its members cannot be assembled, and it has no organs through which actions could be performed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Collective Action, Supervenience, and Constitution.Raimo Tuomela - 1989 - Synthese 80 (2):243 - 266.
Des préférences individuelles aux préférences collectives: ambiguïtés du concept de préférence dans le contexte des théories du choix collectif.J. Nicolas Kaufmann - 1996 - Dialogue 35 (01):53-.
Similar books and articles
Consciousness in Act and Action.Keith Hossack - 2003 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (3):187-203.
On Groups, Group Action and Preferential Treatment.R. W. Brimlow - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:341-376.
The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions.Raimo Tuomela - 1995 - Stanford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads6 ( #542,939 of 2,146,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #385,507 of 2,146,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.