On the Authenticity of the Hippias Maior

Classical Quarterly 20 (3-4):134- (1926)
Grote's powerful defence of Thrasyllus' canon should have taught us at least not to reject lightly any dialogue which, like the Hippias Maior, is there classed as genuine. The burden of proof lies with those who attack our dialogue. Raeder, Ritter, and Apelt consider it to be genuine, while Ast, Jowett, Horneffer, and Röllig declare against it, as also Gomperz, Zeller, and Lutoslawski
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0009838800024873
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,810
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Notes on the Hippias Maior.G. M. A. Grube - 1926 - The Classical Review 40 (06):188-189.
Hippias Majeur/Hippias Mineur.Yvon LaFrance - 2007 - Dialogue 46 (1):193-196.
Dialectic and Disagreement in the Hippias Major. Lee - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38:1-35.
Richard Peters and Valuing Authenticity.M. A. B. Degenhardt - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (s1):209-222.
Hippias.Author unknown - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Enhancing Authenticity.Neil Levy - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):308-318.
Sincerity and Authenticity.Lionel Trilling - 1973 - Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
11 ( #416,145 of 2,202,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,722 of 2,202,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature