Studia Logica 40 (2):99 - 102 (1981)
Some people approve of certain general rules of behavior, or some concrete cases. The others disapprove of or are indifferent to them. In this paper I suggest an axiom system which formalizes the use of these utterances. It may be considered as a special (individualistic) approach to deontic logic.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On Paraconsistent Deontic Logic.Newton C. A. Costa & Walter A. Carnielli - 1986 - Philosophia 16 (3-4):293-305.
Two Approaches to the Formalisation of Defeasible Deontic Reasoning.Henry Prakken - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):73 - 90.
Deontic Database Constraints, Violation and Recovery.José Carmo & Andrew J. I. Jones - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):139 - 165.
Mally's Deontic Logic.G.-J. C. Lokhorst & L. Goble - 2004 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):37-57.
A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox.Marcelo E. Coniglio & Newton M. Peron - 2009 - Principia 13 (3):299-326.
A Different Approach to Deontic Logic: Deontic Logic Viewed as a Variant of Dynamic Logic.J. -J. Ch Meyer - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):109-136.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #278,905 of 2,153,578 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #225,089 of 2,153,578 )
How can I increase my downloads?