Erkenntnis 82 (3):641-651 (2017)

Authors
Alex Grzankowski
Birkbeck, University of London
Abstract
Cognitivists about the emotions minimally hold that it is a necessary condition for being in an emotional state that one make a certain judgement or have a certain belief. For example, if I am angry with Sam, then I must believe that Sam has wronged me. Perhaps I must also elicit a certainly bodily response or undergo some relevant experience, but crucial to the view is the belief or judgement. In the face of ‘recalcitrant emotions’, this once very popular view has come under heavy criticism that has led many theorists to either abandon the view or to offer more nuanced representational views of the emotions. Against what seems to now be received wisdom, I argue that cognitivists have tools at their disposal that allow them to alleviate the apparent conflicts presented by cases of recalcitrance. But I also believe that cognitivists are still in trouble. Although cognitivists have a range of underexplored resources, their use comes at a high cost. In particular, cognitivists must adopt a widespread and thoroughgoing inaccessibility to our own thoughts and judgements that should strike one as implausible. It is mental opacity rather than mental conflict that is the real problem posed by recalcitrance.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016, 2017
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-016-9836-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Navigating Recalcitrant Emotions.Alex Grzankowski - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy 117 (9):501-519.
The “Puzzle” of Emotional Plasticity.Raamy Majeed - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
Forgiving as Emotional Distancing.Santiago Amaya - 2019 - Social Philosophy and Policy 36 (1):6-26.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Irrationality of Recalcitrant Emotions.Michael S. Brady - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (3):413 - 430.
How is Recalcitrant Emotion Possible?Hagit Benbaji - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):577-599.
Philosophy Of Emotion And Ordinary Language.Scott Kimbrough - 2007 - Florida Philosophical Review 7 (1):92-107.
Emotion, Cognition and Feeling.Stephen Grant - 2008 - Synthesis Philosophica 23 (1):53-71.
In Defense of the Argument for Emotional Assent.Martin Smith - 2018 - American Philosophical Quarterly 55 (1):51-62.
Insights and Blindspots of the Cognitivist Theory of Emotions.Andrea Scarantino - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4):729-768.
What If Kant Had Had a Cognitive Theory of the Emotions?Jason Brennan - 2008 - In Valerio Hrsg v. Rohden, Ricardo Terra & Guido Almeida (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 1--219.
Recalcitrant Fears of Death.Kristen Hine - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (4):454-466.
Ambivalence for Cognitivists: A Lesson From Chrysippus?Bill Wringe - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):147-156.
Evaluation, Uncertainty and Motivation.Michael Smith - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (3):305-320.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-08-13

Total views
465 ( #17,653 of 2,455,992 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #14,366 of 2,455,992 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes