Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1):175 - 197 (2001)

J. B. Schneewind's "The Invention of Autonomy" has been hailed as a major interpretation of modern moral thought. Schneewind's narrative, however, elides several serious interpretive issues, particularly in the transition from late medieval to early modern thought. This results in potentially distorted accounts of Thomas Aquinas, Hugo Grotius, and G. W. Leibniz. Since these thinkers play a crucial role in Schneewind's argument, uncertainty over their work calls into question at least some of Schneewind's larger agenda for the history of ethics
Keywords Leibniz  Schneewind  Grotius  natural law  history of ethics  Aquinas
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/0384-9694.00073
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sidgwick's Conception of Ethics.John Deigh - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (2):168-183.
The Methods of J. B. Schneewind.Bart Schultz - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (2):146-167.


Added to PP index

Total views
63 ( #183,182 of 2,519,272 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,272 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes