Tensor products and split-level architecture: Foundational issues in the classicism-connectionism debate

Philosophy of Science 63 (3):S239-S247 (1996)
This paper responds to criticisms levelled by Fodor, Pylyshyn, and McLaughlin against connectionism. Specifically, I will rebut the charge that connectionists cannot account for representational systematicity without implementing a classical architecture. This will be accomplished by drawing on Paul Smolensky's Tensor Product model of representation and on his insights about split-level architectures
Keywords Aesthetics  Architecture  Classicism  Model  Science  Fodor, J  Mclaughlin, B  Pylyshyn, Z
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289957
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,587
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
20 ( #285,059 of 2,235,705 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #446,865 of 2,235,705 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature