Understanding blended multi-source arguments as arguments from partial analogies

Ratio Juris 23 (1):65-100 (2010)
Authors
Marcello Guarini
University of Windsor
Abstract
This paper identifies a type of multi-source (case-based) reasoning and differentiates it from other types of analogical reasoning. Work in cognitive science on mental space mapping or conceptual blending is used to better understand this type of reasoning. The type of argument featured herein will be shown to be a kind of source-blended argument. While it possesses some similarities to traditionally conceived analogical arguments, there are important differences as well. The triple contract (a key development in the usury debates of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries) will be shown to make use of source-blended arguments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2009.00444.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,142
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Limits of Morality.Shelly Kagan - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
The Right and the Good.W. D. Ross - 1930 - Clarendon Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-02-23

Total downloads
10 ( #494,136 of 2,241,490 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #413,416 of 2,241,490 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature