А.C. Danto and P. Ricœur: Narrative as a Tool of Historical Knowledge


Abstract
The article comparatively analyzes A.C. Danto’s and P. Ricœur’s theories of historical narration. Ricœur’s synthetic assimilation of Danto’s views is interpreted as a characteristic phenomenon of the dialogue between hermeneutics and analytical philosophy, and in a broader perspective – of contemporary European continental and Anglo-American philosophical traditions. The version of the analytical philosophy of history developed by Danto is interpreted as being formed in the course of overcoming epistemological program of logical positivism under the impact of a platform of linguistic philosophy, pragmatism and neo-pragmatism as well as F. Nietzsche’s perspectivism and the ideas of existentialism. The articles examines fundamental conclusions of Danto’s “descriptive metaphysics” of history, which influence his understanding of a number of epistemological factors and ontological assumptions specific for the theory of historical narration. At the late stage of the evolution of his philosophy of history, Danto spoke of a radical challenge to his views on the part of T. Kuhn’s theory, but he did not give to it a constructive answer. Despite the significant philosophical differences, a number of Danto’s historical narration theory’s theses became acceptable for Ricœur, especially in the light of the American colleague final confession that knowledge of the past is dependent on the kind of existential presence in history specific for a human being. Taking M. Heidegger’s and H.G. Gadamer’s ideas as a basis of his approach to narration problem, Ricœur considered also important the “linguistic turn” initiated by L. Wittgenstein. Offering a positive evaluation of Danto’s analysis of history language, Ricœur simultaneously rightly criticized him for his neglect of the formal instruments of organizing of narrative – plot, intrigue, and composition that should affect the knowledge resources and testify on the unity of narration features in history and fiction as well.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.30727/0235-1188-2018-10-143-159
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,865
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Narration and Knowledge.Arthur C. Danto - 1982 - Philosophy and Literature 6 (1-2):17-32.
Analytical Philosophy of History.Alan Donagan & Arthur C. Danto - 1967 - History and Theory 6 (3):430.
Narration and Knowledge.A. C. Danto - 1988 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 50 (1):193-193.
Danto, History, and the Tragedy of Human Existence.F. R. Ankersmit - 2003 - History and Theory 42 (3):291–304.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Narration and Knowledge.Arthur C. Danto - 1982 - Philosophy and Literature 6 (1-2):17-32.
Danto's Narrative Philosophy of History and the End of Art.Stephen Snyder - 2015 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 22 (1):50-66.
Danto's Philosophy of History in Retrospective.Frank Ankersmit - 2009 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (2):109-145.
Danto’s Dialectic.Adrian Haddock - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (4):483-493.
On the Nature and Role of Narrative in Historiography.William Dray - 1971 - History and Theory 10 (2):153-171.
Danto and His Critics.Mark Rollins (ed.) - 1993 - Wiley-Blackwell.
The End of Art?Noel Carroll - 1998 - History and Theory 37 (4):17–29.
The End of Art? (Philosophy of Art History).Noel Carroll - 1998 - History and Theory 37 (4):17-29.
The Nonfixity of the Historical Past.David Weberman - 1997 - Review of Metaphysics 50 (4):749 - 768.
Philosophy of History and History of Philosophy of Science.Thomas Uebel - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (1):1-30.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-04

Total views
2 ( #1,264,816 of 2,266,099 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #601,470 of 2,266,099 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature