Between Tyranny and Self-Interest

Theoria 69 (171):140-171 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first contribution of this article is a politico-philosophical map that, drawing upon two common sets of arguments against modern natural rights, might help to explain the prevailing neo-republican position on natural rights. Under the label ‘abstraction argument’, we explore the view that natural rights are a metaphysical construct that usually ends in a violent application of speculative principles to society. Under ‘self-interest argument’, we discuss the notion that natural rights endorse an atomistic and selfish conception of the human being. Second, we show how Cold War authors replicated these two arguments, conveying a biased, largely anti-republican and anti-democratic view of natural rights to the twentieth century. Third, drawing on these two arguments, we critically assess the narrow view of natural rights inherited by neo-republican scholars.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Tyranny and the Global Legal Order.Aoife O'Donoghue - 2021 - Cambridge University Press.
Theories of Tyranny: From Plato to Arendt. [REVIEW]Stephen Schneck - 1996 - Review of Metaphysics 50 (2):388-389.
Tyranny: A New Interpretation.Waller Randy Newell - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
The tyranny of common sense.David Papineau - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 34:19-25.
Emerson on Socrates and the Tyranny of the Majority.Andrew Payne - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:203-207.
Emerson on Socrates and the Tyranny of the Majority.Andrew Payne - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:203-207.
.Eric Voegelin, Ksenia Kolkunova & Alexander Pavlov - 2011 - Russian Sociological Review 10 (3):125-130.
The Culture of Death and Political Tyranny.Gary D. Glenn - 2010 - Catholic Social Science Review 15:47-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-24

Downloads
10 (#1,026,208)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. Martinez
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references