Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):100-101 (2021)

Authors
Alex Guerrero
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
Maybe you only have 1000 units of some resource, but 10,000 people need the resource or would benefit from it. One question: why do you control the resource? Leave that aside for now. A second question: how should you allocate the resource? If you are a decision-maker in a health system, and if the resource has to do with medicine or public health, we are in the world of the ethics of scarce resource allocation decisions in healthcare. Munthe et al 1 note that the ‘operational norms that guide actual decision making in this area tend to be similar across health systems’ and include principles concerning need, prognosis, equal treatment and cost-effectiveness. Even with just these principles, there are hard questions of how they ought to be specified, operationalised and balanced against each other when they conflict. They do not focus on this. Instead, they identify a concern: paying attention only to these principles in making allocation decisions may lead decision-makers to miss ‘negative dynamics’ that result from their decisions. They aim to rectify this by suggesting a ‘sustainability’ principle that would sit alongside these other ethical principles, serving as a side-constraint that rules out certain allocation choices or as a distinct reason to be weighed in the decision-making calculus. I agree that the downstream effects of our allocation decisions matter, …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-107057
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,581
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Who Will Build the Best "Tomorrow"?R. Tompson - 2005 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 36:204-210.
Thinking for Tomorrow: Reflections on Avner de-Shalit.Peter Marshall - 1993 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (1):105-113.
How Is Scepticism Possible?Oswald Hanfling - 1987 - Philosophy 62 (242):435 - 453.
In Defence of Honour.Kwame Anthony Appiah & Julian Baggini - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 53:22-31.
In Defence of Honour.Kwame Anthony Appiah & Julian Baggini - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 53 (53):22-31.
We Must Be Able to Get Used to the Real.Jaco Barnard-Naudé - 2020 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 53 (3):217.
Education Today---And Tomorrow.W. H. Auden & T. C. Worsley - 1982 - Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 3 (3-4):57-64.
I Ought, Therefore I Can Obey.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2018 - Philosophers' Imprint 18.
The Higher Level Skills: Tomorrow's "Basics".Education Commission of the States - 1982 - Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 4 (2):22-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-01-21

Total views
13 ( #752,934 of 2,461,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #222,958 of 2,461,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes