GLOP, The Moral Aim of Law and Trusting Judges [Book Review]

Analysis 72 (3):552-563 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding Judicial Discretion.Barry Hoffmaster - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21 - 55.
Karl Olivecrona on Judicial Law-Making.Torben Spaak - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (4):483-498.
Judges' Use of Moral Arguments in Interpreting Statutes.Jeremy Horder - 2006 - In J. W. Harris, Timothy Andrew Orville Endicott, Joshua Getzler & Edwin Peel (eds.), Properties of Law: Essays in Honour of Jim Harris. Oxford University Press.
Objectivity and Value : Legal Arguments and the Fallibility of Judges.Stephen Guest - 2007 - In Michael Freeman & Ross Harrison (eds.), Law and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Trusting Patients, Trusting Nurses.Derek Sellman - 2007 - Nursing Philosophy 8 (1):28-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-06

Downloads
63 (#187,094)

6 months
1 (#417,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the (in)Significance of Hume’s Law.Samuele Chilovi & Daniel Wodak - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):633-653.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Ineliminability of Hartian Social Rules.Stefan Sciaraffa - 2011 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (3):603-623.

Add more references