Faith and Philosophy 17 (3):348-366 (2000)
The traditional theistic philosopher is committed to hold that God has a perfect will essentially, and that this is better than having a free will. It will be argued that God, being omnipotent, would have the power to create creatures who also have a perfect will essentially. This creates a problem for the traditional theist in solving the problem of moral evil. The problem of actual moral evil will not then be solvable by reference to the value of our moral freedom, in accordance with the Free Will Defense. This favors the view that moral freedom is an excellence in both man and God
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Plantingian Theism and the Free-Will Defence.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2016 - Religious Studies 52 (4):451-460.
Similar books and articles
Could God Do Something Evil? A Molinist Solution to the Problem of Divine Freedom.R. Zachary Manis - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):209-223.
D. Z. Phillips' Problems with Evil and with God.William Hasker - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (3):151 - 160.
Depravity, Divine Responsibility and Moral Evil: A Critique of a New Free Will Defence.A. M. Weisberger - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (3):375-390.
Freedom and the Free Will Defense.Richard M. Gale - 1990 - Social Theory and Practice 16 (3):397-423.
Duns Scotus on the Goodness of God.Marilyn McCord Adams - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):486-505.
INTRODUCTION: The Evidential Argument From Evil.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1996 - In The Evidential Argument from Evil.
Schelling's Dialogical Freedom Essay: Provocative Philosophy Then and Now.Bernard Freydberg - 2008 - State University of New York Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads44 ( #119,603 of 2,178,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #112,599 of 2,178,143 )
How can I increase my downloads?