Signals, Schemas, Subsidiaries, and Skills

Tradition and Discovery 33 (3):44-62 (2006)
This essay examines Michael Polanyi’s notion of tacit knowing and seeks to clarify and elaborate upon its claims. Tacit knowing, which is conscious although inarticulate, must be distinguished from tacit processes, which are largely unconscious. Schematization is explored as a primary tacit process that humans share with all animals. This tacit process organizes and secures, in long-term memory, information of interest provided by receptors and those learned skifls conducive to survival. Human empirical knowing integrates schematized subsidiaries info articulate explicitness through culturally-embedded symbols evoked in terms of felt fittingness
Keywords Major Philosophers  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1057-1027
DOI 10.5840/traddisc2006/200733341
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
91 ( #59,210 of 2,199,496 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,210 of 2,199,496 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature