Three bad arguments for intentional property epiphenomenalism

Erkenntnis 36 (3):311 - 331 (1992)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00204132
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,349
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Type Two Cuts, Bad Cuts and Very Bad Cuts.Renling Jin - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1241-1252.
Should Property-Dualists Be Substance-Hylomorphists?Gordon Barnes - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:285-299.
Why Davidson is Not a Property Epiphenomenalist.Sophie Gibb - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):407 – 422.
Fodor's Vindication of Folk Psychology and the Charge of Epiphenomenalism.Nicholas P. Power - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (January):183-196.
Semifactuals and Epiphenomenalism.Danilo Suster - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (26):23-43.
What's Wrong with Anomalous Monism.Norman P. Melchert - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (May):265-74.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
30 ( #175,648 of 2,193,297 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,646 of 2,193,297 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature