Cybernetics and mind-body problems

It is asked to what extent answers to such questions as ?Can machines think??, ?Could robots have feelings?? might be expected to yield insight into traditional mind?body questions. It has sometimes been assumed that answering the first set of questions would be the same as answering the second. Against this approach other philosophers have argued that answering the first set of questions would not help us to answer the second. It is argued that both of these assessments are mistaken. It is then claimed, although not argued in detail, that the following three approaches to the first set of questions are mistaken: (1) machines (and robots) obviously cannot think, feel, create, etc., since they do only what they are programmed to do; (2) on the basis of ah analysis of the meaning of the words ?machine? ('robot?, ?think?, ?feel?, etc.) we can see that in principle it would be impossible for machines (or robots) to think, feel, create, etc.; (3) machines (and robots) obviously can (or could) think, feel, etc., since they do certain things which, if we were to do them, would require thought, feeling, etc. It is argued that, once it is seen why approach (2) is mistaken, it becomes desirable to decline ?in principle? approaches to the first set of questions and to favor ?piecemeal investigations? where attention is centered upon what is actually taking place in machine technology, the development of new programming techniques, etc. Some suggestions are made concerning the relevance of current computer simulation studies to traditional mind?body questions. A new set of questions is proposed as a substitute for the first set of questions. It is hoped that attempts to answer these may provide us with new and detailed portraits of the mind?body relationship
Keywords Body  Cybernetics  Feeling  Machine  Metaphysics  Mind  Thought
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201746908601562
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,840
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Minds and Machines.Hilary Putnam - 1960 - In Sidney Hook (ed.), Journal of Symbolic Logic. New York University Press. pp. 57-80.
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Paul Edwards (ed.) - 1967 - New York: Macmillan.
Robots, Consciousness and Programmed Behaviour.Keith Gunderson - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (August):109-22.
Man a Machine.Julien Offray De La Mettrie - 1914 - Philosophical Review 23 (3):359-360.
Computers in Psychology.Alan Newell & Herbert A. Simon - 1963 - In D. Luce (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. John Wiley & Sons.. pp. 1--361.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Turing Machines and the Mind-Body Problem.J. J. Clarke - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (February):1-12.
Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems.Benny Shanon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
The Nature of Mind.M. Rosenthal David (ed.) - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
Can a Machine Be Conscious? How?Stevan Harnad - 2003 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4):67-75.
Recent Work on the Mind-Body Problem.Jerome A. Shaffer - 1965 - American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (April):81-104.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

17 ( #287,124 of 2,178,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,623 of 2,178,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums