Debate: What is Personhood in the Age of AI?

AI and Society 36 (2):473–486 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a friendly interdisciplinary debate, we interrogate from several vantage points the question of “personhood” in light of contemporary and near-future forms of social AI. David J. Gunkel approaches the matter from a philosophical and legal standpoint, while Jordan Wales offers reflections theological and psychological. Attending to metaphysical, moral, social, and legal understandings of personhood, we ask about the position of apparently personal artificial intelligences in our society and individual lives. Re-examining the “person” and questioning prominent construals of that category, we hope to open new views upon urgent and much-discussed questions that, quite soon, may confront us in our daily lives.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-03

Downloads
2,517 (#4,928)

6 months
433 (#4,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Gunkel
Northern Illinois University
Jordan Joseph Wales
Hillsdale College

Citations of this work

Moral Status and Intelligent Robots.John-Stewart Gordon & David J. Gunkel - 2021 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 60 (1):88-117.
The human biological advantage over AI.William Stewart - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-10.
The Specter of Automation.Zachary Biondi - 2023 - Philosophia 51 (3):1093-1110.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (4):435-50.
Confessions.R. S. Augustine & Pine-Coffin - 2019 - Hackett Publishing Company.
Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics.Peter F. Strawson - 1959 - London, England: Routledge. Edited by Wenfang Wang.

View all 62 references / Add more references