Love – Exploitable Resource or 'No-Lose Situation'? Reconciling Jónasdóttir's Feminist View with Bhaskar's Philosophy of Meta-Reality
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Critical Realism 10 (4):419-441 (2011)
In this article I attempt to reconcile two seemingly conflicting theorisations of love, the one elaborated by Roy Bhaskar as part of his philosophy of meta-Reality and Anna G. Jónasdóttir’s historical materialist-radical feminist theory of love power. While Bhaskar emphasises the essentially non-dual character of love, envisioning it as a ‘no-lose situation’, Jónasdóttir stresses the antagonistic features structuring love relations by conceptualising love as a productive power that men tend to exploit women of. Rather than seeing these accounts as mutually exclusive I show that they can be reconciled by aid of the general ontology elaborated by Bhaskar in his philosophy of meta-Reality
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nel Noddings (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press.
Roy Bhaskar (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Routledge.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roy Bhaskar (2002). Reflections on Meta-Reality: Transcendence, Emancipation, and Everyday Life. Sage Publications.
Roy Bhaskar (2002). Beyond East and West: Spirituality and Comparative Religion in an Age of Global Crisis. Sage Publications.
Anna G. Jónasdóttir (2008). Feminist Questions, Marx's Method and the Theorisation of "Love Power". In Anna G. Jónasdóttir & Kathleen B. Jones (eds.), The Political Interests of Gender Revisited: Redoing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face. United Nations University Press.
Anna G. Jónasdóttir (1991). Love Power and Political Interests: Towards a Theory of Patriarchy in Contemporary Western Societies. University of Örebro.
Roy Bhaskar (2002). From Science to Emancipation: Alienation and the Actuality of Enlightenment. Sage Publications.
Roy Bhaskar (2007). The Philosophy of Meta-Reality, Part II: Agency, Perfectability, Novelty. Interview by Mervyn Hartwig. Journal of Critical Realism 1 (1):67-93.
Roy Bhaskar (2007). The Philosophy of Meta-Reality, Part I: Identity, Spirituality, System. Interview by Mervyn Hartwig. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1).
Michael Lacewing (2005). Real Love. The Philosophers' Magazine 29 (29):63-66.
Michalinos Zembylas (2006). Science Education as Emancipatory: The Case of Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy of Meta-Reality. Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (5):665–676.
Bennett W. Helm (2008). Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Added to index2011-10-08
Total downloads24 ( #198,179 of 1,925,796 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,410 of 1,925,796 )
How can I increase my downloads?