Ethics and Information Technology 22 (4):307-320 (2020)

David Gunkel
Northern Illinois University
The task of this essay is to respond to the question concerning robots and responsibility—to answer for the way that we understand, debate, and decide who or what is able to answer for decisions and actions undertaken by increasingly interactive, autonomous, and sociable mechanisms. The analysis proceeds through three steps or movements. It begins by critically examining the instrumental theory of technology, which determines the way one typically deals with and responds to the question of responsibility when it involves technology. It then considers three instances where recent innovations in robotics challenge this standard operating procedure by opening gaps in the usual way of assigning responsibility. The innovations considered in this section include: autonomous technology, machine learning, and social robots. The essay concludes by evaluating the three different responses—instrumentalism 2.0, machine ethics, and hybrid responsibility—that have been made in face of these difficulties in an effort to map out the opportunities and challenges of and for responsible robotics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-017-9428-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principia Ethica.G. E. Moore - 1903 - Dover Publications.
Computing Machinery and Intelligence.Alan M. Turing - 1950 - Mind 59 (October):433-60.
Being and Time.Ronald W. Hepburn, Martin Heidegger, John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson - 1962 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (56):276.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Debunking (the) Retribution (Gap).Steven R. Kraaijeveld - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics:1-14.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Towards Cognitive Robotics: Robotics, Biology and Developmental Psychology.Mark Lee, Ulrich Nehmzow & Marcos Rodrigues - 2012 - In David McFarland, Keith Stenning & Maggie McGonigle (eds.), The Complex Mind. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 103.
Responsibility and Vigilance.Samuel Murray - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):507-527.
The Mark of Responsibility.John Gardner - 2003 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2):157-171.
Responsible Ads: A Workable Ideal.M. Hyman - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):199-210.


Added to PP index

Total views
80 ( #120,993 of 2,385,743 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #43,412 of 2,385,743 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes