Underspecification of Cognitive Status in Reference Production: Some Empirical Predictions

Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):249-268 (2012)
Within the Givenness Hierarchy framework of Gundel, Hedberg, and Zacharski (1993), lexical items included in referring forms are assumed to conventionally encode two kinds of information: conceptual information about the speaker’s intended referent and procedural information about the assumed cognitive status of that referent in the mind of the addressee, the latter encoded by various determiners and pronouns. This article focuses on effects of underspecification of cognitive status, establishing that, although salience and accessibility play an important role in reference processing, the Givenness Hierarchy itself is not a hierarchy of degrees of salience/accessibility, contrary to what has often been assumed. We thus show that the framework is able to account for a number of experimental results in the literature without making additional assumptions about form-specific constraints associated with different referring forms
Keywords Underspecification  Reference  Cognitive status  Relevance  Accessbility  Givenness Hierarchy  Salience
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01184.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,621
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Coherence and Coreference Revisited.A. Kehler, L. Kertz, H. Rohde & J. L. Elman - 2007 - Journal of Semantics 25 (1):1-44.
Quantity Implicatures in Reference Understanding.J. K. Gundel - 1998 - Pragmatics and Cognition 6 (1):21-46.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reference, Perception, and Attention.Athanasios Raftopoulos - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (3):339 - 360.
What Does It Take To Refer?Kent Bach - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. pp. 516--554.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

80 ( #65,341 of 2,169,071 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,364 of 2,169,071 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums