Human Dignity of “Offenders”: A Limitation on Substantive Criminal Law [Book Review]

Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187-205 (2012)
Abstract
The paper argues for attaching a significant role to the dignity of offenders as a limitation on the scope of substantive criminal law. Three different aspects of human dignity are discussed. Human dignity is closely connected with the principle of culpability. Respecting the dignity of offenders requires that we assign criminal liability according to the actual attitudes of the offenders towards the interests protected by the offence. The doctrine of natural and probable consequence of complicity, which allows us to assign liability for mens rea offenses to a negligent offender, violates the dignity of the offender; it treats the incautious offender as if she had willfully expressed disrespect towards the protected interest. The human dignity core of privacy is invaded by criminalizing the private possession of child pornography. By extending the prohibition of the creation, sale and distribution of child pornography to the private possession of pornography, the State attempts to control the way the individual expresses an essential part of the self—his sexual fantasies—within himself. Dignity demands that our actions convey an attitude of respect towards human beings. The expressive meaning of disrespect is culture-dependent. The historical association with totalitarian regimes explains our reluctance to impose a legal duty to report past crime: the individual who is legally required to turn a suspect into the police is viewed as an “informant.”
Keywords Human dignity  Criminal law  Offenders
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-012-9151-3
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,317
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Harm to Others.Joel Feinberg - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):295-298.
[Book Review] the Decent Society. [REVIEW]Avishai Margalit - 1998 - Social Theory and Practice 24 (3):449-469.
Punishment and Responsibility.H. L. A. Hart - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):162-162.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood.Jeffrey H. Reiman - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1):26-44.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Criminalizing Behaviour to Protect Human Dignity.Tatjana Hörnle - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):307-325.
Two Challenges for Dignity as an Expressive Norm.Jukka Varelius - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):327-340.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Coming Clean About the Criminal Law.James Edwards - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):315-332.
Criminalizing Behaviour to Protect Human Dignity.Tatjana Hörnle - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):307-325.
Legislative Duty and the Independence of Law.J. H. Bogart - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187 - 203.
Human Dignity as a Right.Shaoping Gan - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):370-384.
A Failure to Prevent Crime Should It Be Criminal?Miriam Gur‐Arye - 2001 - Criminal Justice Ethics 20 (2):3-30.
Privacy, Safety, and Human Dignity.John R. Rowan - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 16:171-181.
''Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons''.Zachary Hoskins - 2011 - Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8 (2):369-384.
Human Rights and Human Dignity.Doris Schroeder - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323-335.
Added to PP index
2012-04-27

Total downloads
24 ( #236,415 of 2,223,805 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #180,515 of 2,223,805 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature