Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 31 (2):323-345 (2018)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This article juxtaposes a jurisprudential thesis and a practical problem in an attempt to gain critical insight into both. The jurisprudential thesis is Dworkin’s rights thesis. The practical problem revolves around judicial resort to the floodgates argument in civil adjudication (or, more specifically, a version of this argument focused on adjudicative resources, which is dubbed here the FA). The analysis yields three principal observations: (1) Judicial resort to the FA is discordant with the rights thesis. (2) The rights thesis is instructive in one way but mistaken in another. While Dworkin has highlighted some valid and sound reasons against judicial policymaking, his conclusive exclusion of judicial policymaking from civil law adjudication is erroneous. Civil law adjudication, it is argued, is an arena of ineliminable tension between principle and policy. (3) The FA is a type of policy argument particularly vulnerable to objections against judicial policymaking. There should, therefore, be a (rebuttable) presumption against judicial resort to it.
|
Keywords | Ronald Dworkin the floodgates argument the rights thesis policy and principle in judicial reasoning civil adjudication jurisprudence tort law |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ronald Dworkin on Law as Integrity: Rights as Principles of Adjudication.Paul Gaffney - 1996 - Edwin Mellen Press.
Dworkin’s Morality and its Limited Implications for Law.Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 25 (1):79-95.
Equality & the Rule of Law: R. M. Dworkin & Liberalism.Sheldon Sherwood Wein - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
Constitutional Rights, Judicial Review, and the Distribution of Benefits.Patricia Gail Smith Milanich - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Interpreting Law.Robert Baxter Westmoreland - 1987 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Principles, Policies and the Power of Courts.Dr Dimitrios Kyritsis - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (2):379-398.
Judges Taken Too Seriously: Professor Dworkin's Views on Jurisprudence.Michel Troper - 1988 - Ratio Juris 1 (2):162-175.
Ronald Dworkin on Law and Interpretation.Paul Lawrence Gaffney - 1990 - Dissertation, The Catholic University of America
Legal Theory and Political Legitimacy: Positivism, Dworkin's Rights Thesis, and Critical Legal Studies.Kenneth Joel Kress - 1989 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Tobacco Control Litigation: Broader Impacts on Health Rights Adjudication.Oscar A. Cabrera & Juan Carballo - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):147-162.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-04-05
Total views
247 ( #45,469 of 2,519,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #13,305 of 2,519,861 )
2019-04-05
Total views
247 ( #45,469 of 2,519,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #13,305 of 2,519,861 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads