Authors
Rickard Gustavsson
Umeå University
Abstract
This thesis is about Plato‘s dialogue Cratylus, which is one of the earliest texts in the history ofphilosophy of language and has generated much interpretive controversy. In the dialogue, Platoexamines two theories on the correctness of names; conventionalism and naturalism. However,there is no clear positive outcome in the dialogue in regard to the debate betweenconventionalism and naturalism. Therefore, scholars have long been divided as to what Plato‘sown position on the correctness of names is. Another puzzling feature of the dialogue concernsthe etymological section, which has often been ignored or treated in isolation in modernscholarship. This section takes up about half of the dialogue and offers elaborate explanations ofa large number of words in the Greek language. Some recent studies of the Cratylus, however,are shedding much welcome light on the etymological section and the role it plays in thedialogue as a whole. In this thesis, I compare two competing interpretations of the etymologicalsection and discuss how an understanding of the etymologies can help us understand Plato‘sposition on the correctness of names and the purpose of the dialogue as a whole. In TimothyBaxter‘s interpretation, the etymological section should be read as a parody which amounts to aPlatonic critique of a mistaken attitude towards names and language found especially in thepoetry and philosophy in Plato‘s time. David Sedley, on the other hand, argues that theetymologies are seriously intended by Plato as a method of linguistic and historical analysis, amethod he himself endorsed and practiced. If the etymologies are taken seriously, Sedley argues,they show that Plato favored a form of naturalism in regard to the correctness of names. Afterproviding an outline and evaluation of these two interpretations, the thesis concludes with myown proposal. Although I disagree with some of Sedley‘s particular interpretations andarguments, I find myself in broad agreement with his general conclusions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Plato: Complete Works.J. Cooper (ed.) - 1997 - Hackett.
Plato: Complete Works.J. Cooper & D. S. Hutchinson - 1998 - Phronesis 43 (2):197-206.
Plato's Cratylus.David Sedley - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Reading of Plato's "Cratylus".Rachel Barney - 1996 - Dissertation, Princeton University
The Ambiguity of 'Name' in Plato's 'Cratylus'.Jeffrey B. Gold - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (3):223 - 251.
What's in a Name: An Interpretation of Plato's "Cratylus".Donald James Mclean - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
Plato's Cratylus.David Sedley - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
An Interpretation of Plato's Cratylus.Simon Keller - 2000 - Phronesis 45 (4):284-305.
Inquiry Without Names in Plato's Cratylus.Christine J. Thomas - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 341-364.
Plato on Conventionalism.Rachel Barney - 1997 - Phronesis 42 (2):143 - 162.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-06-27

Total views
8 ( #977,836 of 2,448,959 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #443,144 of 2,448,959 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes