Conflicting reasons in the small-improvement argument

Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):754-763 (2010)
Abstract
The small-improvement argument is usually considered the most powerful argument against comparability, viz the view that for any two alternatives an agent is rationally required either to prefer one of the alternatives to the other or to be indifferent between them. We argue that while there might be reasons to believe each of the premises in the small-improvement argument, there is a conflict between these reasons. As a result, the reasons do not provide support for believing the conjunction of the premises. Without support for the conjunction of the premises, the small-improvement argument for incomparability fails.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.648.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Value Relations Revisited.Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2012 - Economics and Philosophy 28 (2):133-164.
Prospectism and the Weak Money Pump Argument.Martin Peterson - 2015 - Theory and Decision 78 (3):451-456.
Decision Making in the Face of Parity.Miriam Schoenfield - 2014 - Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1):263-277.
Locating Value in Moral Progress.Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (1):137-52.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
External Reasons.Dean Lubin - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (2):273-291.
Observer-Relative Chances and the Doomsday Argument.John Leslie - 1997 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):427 – 436.
On Human Improvement.Asher Seidel - 1999 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (2):209-222.
The Small Improvement Argument.Nicolas Espinoza - 2008 - Synthese 165 (1):127 - 139.
The Small-Improvement Argument Rescued.Erik Carlson - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):171-174.
Added to PP index
2009-09-10

Total downloads
100 ( #57,077 of 2,225,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #180,515 of 2,225,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature