Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2):300-305 (2004)
s distinction between perfect and imperfect procedural justice relies on the notion of a procedure that is guaranteed to lead to a certain independently specifiable result. Clarification of this notion shows that it makes the distinction between perfect and imperfect procedural justice unreal, in the following sense: whether, in a particular case, we have an instance of perfect or imperfect procedural justice depends only on how we choose to specify the procedure that is being followed. Key Words: procedural justice John Rawls.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation Within a Procedural Theory of Justice.Emanuela Ceva - 2009 - Res Publica 15 (3):219-235.
Similar books and articles
Plural Values and Heterogeneous Situations. Considerations on the Scope for a Political Theory of Justice.Emanuela Ceva - 2007 - European Journal of Political Theory 6 (3):359-375.
Perfect Informationà laWalras Versus Perfect Informationà laMarshall.Michel de Vroey - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (4):465-492.
You Ought to Be Ashamed of Yourself (When You Violate an Imperfect Moral Obligation).Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):193-208.
Examining the Construct of Organizational Justice: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Relations with Work Attitudes and Behaviors. [REVIEW]Chockalingam Viswesvaran & Deniz S. Ones - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (3):193 - 203.
The Imperfect Nature of Corporate Responsibilities to Stakeholders.David Lea - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):201-217.
Rawls: Teleology or Perfect Procedural Justice.Alicia Juarrero - 1995 - Journal of Social Philosophy 26 (2):127-138.
Impure Procedural Justice and the Management of Conflicts About Values.Emanuela Ceva - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):5-22.
Procedural Justice?: Implications of the Rawls-Habermas Debate for Discourse Ethics.Cristina Lafont - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2):163-181.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #88,162 of 2,154,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,428 of 2,154,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?