Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):2-10 (2021)
| Authors | |
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | bioethics de-extinction democratic deliberation gene drive gene editing governance of emerging technologies public deliberation public engagement |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1002/hast.1314 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Public Engagement With Brain Organoid Research and Application: Lessons From Genome Editing.Corinna Klingler, Lara Wiese, Gardar Arnason & Robert Ranisch - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (2):98-100.
Similar books and articles
Deficits of Public Deliberation in U.S. Oversight for Gene Edited Organisms.Jennifer Kuzma - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):25-33.
Restructuring Deliberation Using a Cultural Theory Lens.Teshanee Williams - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):62-65.
Envisioning Complex Futures: Collective Narratives and Reasoning in Deliberations Over Gene Editing in the Wild.Ben Curran Wills, Michael K. Gusmano & Mark Schlesinger - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):92-100.
Narratives in Public Deliberation: Empowering Gene Editing Debate with Storytelling.Kaiping Chen & Michael M. Burgess - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):85-91.
Empowering Indigenous Knowledge in Deliberations on Gene Editing in the Wild.Riley Taitingfong & Anika Ullah - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):74-84.
Giving Voice to the Voiceless in Environmental Gene Editing.Natalie Kofler & Colleen M. Grogan - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):66-73.
The Decision Phases Framework for Public Engagement: Engaging Stakeholders About Gene Editing in the Wild.S. Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling, Adam Kokotovich & Jason A. Delborne - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):48-61.
The Complexity of the Gene and the Precision of CRISPR : What is the Gene That is Being Edited?Esha Shah, David Ludwig & Phil Macnaghten - 2021 - Elementa: Science of Anthropocene 9.
Genetic Control in Historical Perspective: The Legacy of India's Genetic Control of Mosquitoes Unit.Rebecca Wilbanks - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):11-18.
Public Views on Gene Editing and its Uses.Hub Zwart, George Gaskell & Imre Bard - 2017 - Nature Biotechnology 35 (11):121-123.
Emerging sociotechnical imaginaries for gene edited crops for foods in the United States: implications for governance.Carmen Bain, Sonja Lindberg & Theresa Selfa - 2020 - Agriculture and Human Values 37 (2):265-279.
The Legal Framework Concerning Gene-Editing Techniques in the UK: Problems and Solutions.Angela Grunert - 2020 - In Jochen Taupitz & Silvia Deuring (eds.), Rechtliche Aspekte der Genom-Editierung an der Menschlichen Keimbahn : A Comparative Legal Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 457-482.
Worldwide Deliberation and Public Use of Reason Online.May Thorseth - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):243-252.
Gene Editing: How Can You Ask “Whether” If You Don't Know “How”?Bryan Cwik - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (3):13-17.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-12-14
Total views
3 ( #1,358,205 of 2,507,684 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,140 of 2,507,684 )
2021-12-14
Total views
3 ( #1,358,205 of 2,507,684 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,140 of 2,507,684 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
