Minerva 50 (3):363-379 (2012)

Imagine putting together a jigsaw puzzle that works like the board game in the movie “Jumanji”: When you finish, whatever the puzzle portrays becomes real. The children playing “Jumanji” learn to prepare for the reality that emerges from the next throw of the dice. But how would this work for the puzzle of scientific research? How do you prepare for unlocking the secrets of the atom, or assembling from the bottom-up nanotechnologies with unforeseen properties – especially when completion of such puzzles lies decades after the first scattered pieces are tentatively assembled? In the inaugural issue of this journal, Michael Polanyi argued that because the progress of science is unpredictable, society must only move forward with solving the puzzle until the picture completes itself. Decades earlier, Frederick Soddy argued that once the potential for danger reveals itself, one must reorient the whole of one’s work to avoid it. While both scientists stake out extreme positions, Soddy’s approach – together with the action taken by the like-minded Leo Szilard – provides a foundation for the anticipatory governance of emerging technologies. This paper narrates the intertwining stories of Polanyi, Soddy and Szilard, revealing how anticipation influenced governance in the case of atomic weapons and how Polanyi’s claim in “The Republic of Science” of an unpredictable and hence ungovernable science is faulty on multiple levels
Keywords Michael Polanyi  Frederick Soddy  Anticipatory governance  Emerging technologies  Atomic bomb  Leo Szilard  H.G. Wells
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11024-012-9204-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,916
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Growth of Science in Society.Michael Polanyi - 1967 - Minerva 5 (4):533-545.
Criteria for Scientific Development: Public Policy and National Goals.Edward Shils - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):115-117.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
100 ( #115,338 of 2,497,980 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,497,980 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes